Use Cases

Built for AI that handles things that matter

When the data is privileged, the actions have consequences, and the auditors are real, a vector database with a chat wrapper isn't enough. These are the use cases where governed memory stops being a feature and becomes the product.

⚖️ Professional Services

Firm AI with real ethical walls

A law firm's AI has to know things its users individually may not see. Matter walls, conflict-of-interest screens, and classification levels aren't features you can prompt into a model — they have to be enforced before retrieval, every time.

Yohanun labels every memory with its matter and classification, checks clearances against a platform-owned ledger, and blocks conflicted grants at the graph level. When a lawyer leaves a matter, one revocation takes effect on the next request. When a matter changes hands, custody transfers with a single ledger entry — no data migration, no provenance rewritten.

Matter-scoped memory with conflict-checked clearances
Every gated read in an append-only audit trail
Self-hosted — privileged data never leaves the firm
Enterprise Features

The Wall in Action

Associate on Matter A asks:
"What do we know about the counterparty's negotiating position?"
What retrieval sees:
Only memory labeled for matters this associate is cleared on — the filter runs inside the database query. Matter B's files aren't "hidden from the answer." They were never candidates.
And in the audit log:
read · principal: associate_7 · matters: [matter_a] · 14 memories returned · 0 escalations
🤖 Agent Teams

Agent fleets with boundaries

Deploy a team of AI agents where each has private memory, all share house knowledge, and none can act beyond its mandate. Each agent's memory is owner-walled in the same store; shared knowledge is a custody grant, not a copy.

Mandates give each agent an explicit action limit — commit freely below the line, escalate to a human above it. Retire an agent and transfer its memory custody to a successor with one ledger entry.

This isn't hypothetical: we run our own multi-project engineering agents on exactly this architecture, every day.

Per-agent private memory, shared team knowledge
Mandates with human escalation — commits fail closed
Succession: transfer an agent's memory without touching data
See Product Details

A Mandate, Not a Prompt

# Agent asks to act
POST /api/access/authorize-action
{ "action": "issue_refund", "amount": 180 }

# Under its €250 mandate → allowed, audited
{ "decision": "allow" }

# Over the line → escalates to a human queue
{ "action": "issue_refund", "amount": 4800 }
{ "decision": "escalate",
  "escalation_id": "esc_91…" }

# No mandate, no unit match → never silently allowed.
# Commits fail closed.
📚 Domain Experts

Grounded experts on a governed corpus

Some domains — law, theology, medicine, standards — have authoritative sources with different weights. An expert system there can't just retrieve "similar text." It has to answer from the corpus, carry each source's authority grade into the answer, cite everything, and refuse to freelance beyond what the sources support.

Yohanun powers this as a two-layer architecture: a shared, curated corpus everyone reads, plus a private per-user layer — their documents, their history, their threads — walled by ownership in the same gate. The expert knows the field and remembers you.

Authority-graded retrieval — sources ranked by weight, not just similarity
Grounded generation with citations on every claim
Private user layer — the corpus is shared, your data isn't
Discuss Your Domain

Two Layers, One Gate

Shared corpus (read-only)
The authoritative sources, curated and graded. Every user queries the same corpus; nobody's questions contaminate it.
Private layer (owner-walled)
Your uploads, your conversation history, your long-running threads — returned only to you, enforced in the retrieval gate.
The result
An expert that answers with the field's authority and your context — and can prove where every sentence came from.

The same primitives, other domains

Labeled memory, cleared principals, mandates, audit, and outcome learning compose into whatever your domain calls its version of "trust."

🏥

Healthcare

Patient context that only returns to cleared roles, with a per-read audit trail — enforcement your compliance team can verify on every single read, not attest to once a year.

Role-walled patient memory
💼

Financial Services

Chinese walls between desks, spending mandates on agent actions, and an immutable record of who saw what and who approved what.

Conflict walls + action mandates
🏢

Enterprise Copilots

Company-wide assistants where HR memory doesn't surface in engineering chats — departmental walls enforced in retrieval, not requested in prompts.

Department-walled context
📞

Customer Operations

Agents that remember every customer across channels, act within refund/discount mandates, and escalate the rest to humans — with the audit trail built in.

Cross-channel memory + mandates
🧠

Personal Assistants

Assistants that build understanding over months — memory that decays like memory, owned by the user, portable across whatever model runs it.

User-owned long-term memory
⚙️

DevOps & Incident Response

Systems that remember past incidents, learn which fixes actually worked via outcome feedback, and know exactly which actions need a human sign-off.

Outcome-weighted runbook memory

What does trust look like in your domain?

Tell us your use case and constraints — we'll map them onto the platform's primitives and show you exactly what's enforced where.